For streaming video, Hulu's biggest draw is that it offers current TV episodes while Netflix offers a richer library of movies and TV shows. Many of these shows are available on TV and cable.
But if one was to pay for both Hulu Plus and Netflix streaming, the cost would come out to about $16 a month. This beats most cable packages that I've been advertised to in the last year.
For a fraction of the price, I get most of the shows I want to watch. SyFy shows, a few Primetime shows like Castle and Fringe. Oh, and dynamic duo of Stewart and Colbert are back (yeah, yeah, I know I can watch them on Comedy Central's website - but this is about convenience).
And I'm winning to bet that Amazon might get in on the act.
So who needs cable and satellite TV anymore? No wonder they're scared. No wonder the studios are having to figure out what they need to do about new media.
News, Opinions and Analysis, and Tips on Mobile Life - XO, iPhone, and other Mobile Devices
Showing posts with label Cable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cable. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Sunday, March 13, 2011
EVIL ATT To Start Capping DSL Services In May
This post from Electonista says it all.
Starting in May, ATT will start capping DSL use at 150 GB. A $10 fee will be assess for an additional 50 GB.
Does this affect you and how you use the Internet?
Let me do some simple math on this. This comes to 4.93 GB a day. Frankly, I think this is so bogus.
We are increasingly relying on our Internet services for streaming media and to get pertinent information. Heck, I don't even own a TV.
This just isn't right. Unfortunately, I think ATT will get away with this given the political atmosphere in Washington and the GOP not want the FCC to do anything at all.
Make no mistake about this. This is about GREED. And this can potentially destroy the Internet and innovation.
If there was ever a time for anyone in Washington to show some backbone, coming out against this would be an easy win.
More here.
Starting in May, ATT will start capping DSL use at 150 GB. A $10 fee will be assess for an additional 50 GB.
Does this affect you and how you use the Internet?
Let me do some simple math on this. This comes to 4.93 GB a day. Frankly, I think this is so bogus.
We are increasingly relying on our Internet services for streaming media and to get pertinent information. Heck, I don't even own a TV.
This just isn't right. Unfortunately, I think ATT will get away with this given the political atmosphere in Washington and the GOP not want the FCC to do anything at all.
Make no mistake about this. This is about GREED. And this can potentially destroy the Internet and innovation.
If there was ever a time for anyone in Washington to show some backbone, coming out against this would be an easy win.
More here.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Net Neutrality, Begged AT&T & Verizon
It's interesting when any giant corporations argue that all is good and there is not a need for the people to worry. That is precisely the time the consumers to start worrying. It is a bit like kids who have already done something bad or is about to do something bad.
AT&T along with Verizon got together to tell the FCC that they already have to tools to enforce net neutrality. Be that as it may, what's wrong with a bit of assurance from Congress? And AT&T getting together with Verizon to make this point? Shocking.
To make the story short, the largest cable provider, Comcast, has been screwing some of its subscribers by slowing down their download speed. It was targeted specifically at bandwidth hogs. P2P kind of things. Or so they said. I'm sure it's not a precursor to the day when folks start to download movies and other media.
The two telecom giants want the FCC to come down hard on Comcast. Keep in mind that no mention of consumers were made of AT&T and Verizon only that less regulation is good for the broadband industry.
This really bare watching as new broadband technology come online in the next few years. A lot of new wireless broadband technology such as Sprint's WiMax and LTE are months of not a couple of years away. Given an increasingly mobile workforce, it would not be inconceivable that one day, users abandon the shackles of today's broadband for tomorrow's faster and mobile services. These are the areas where AT&T and Verizon dominates and they know it.
It's never good when corporations come out against industry regulations and made no mention of consumer welfare. This is an issue we all need to pay close attention to given that it has not registered at all with mainstream Web media.
All mobile warriors, keep an eye on this and let me know if you read any developments.
Update: Here are some links related to this issue.
• AT&T to metering DSL subscribers.
• AT&T spokesman Michael Coe says that given the trends the company is seeing, a form of usage-based pricing for those customers who have abnormally high usage patterns is "inevitable.
• Comcast to user: stop using your cable broadband if you want to keep it.
• Looks like the Canadians are going through the same thing. And they've got more regulations in general than Americans here.
• Webware wonders if Comcast will cut users off. (Only if we let them.) Read the comments by one of the readers, surfyogi2. Way to go, dude. Fight back!
• Really sad for Cox users.
• Roadrunner too. Rot spreading on the net indeed.
AT&T along with Verizon got together to tell the FCC that they already have to tools to enforce net neutrality. Be that as it may, what's wrong with a bit of assurance from Congress? And AT&T getting together with Verizon to make this point? Shocking.
To make the story short, the largest cable provider, Comcast, has been screwing some of its subscribers by slowing down their download speed. It was targeted specifically at bandwidth hogs. P2P kind of things. Or so they said. I'm sure it's not a precursor to the day when folks start to download movies and other media.
The two telecom giants want the FCC to come down hard on Comcast. Keep in mind that no mention of consumers were made of AT&T and Verizon only that less regulation is good for the broadband industry.
This really bare watching as new broadband technology come online in the next few years. A lot of new wireless broadband technology such as Sprint's WiMax and LTE are months of not a couple of years away. Given an increasingly mobile workforce, it would not be inconceivable that one day, users abandon the shackles of today's broadband for tomorrow's faster and mobile services. These are the areas where AT&T and Verizon dominates and they know it.
It's never good when corporations come out against industry regulations and made no mention of consumer welfare. This is an issue we all need to pay close attention to given that it has not registered at all with mainstream Web media.
All mobile warriors, keep an eye on this and let me know if you read any developments.
Update: Here are some links related to this issue.
• AT&T to metering DSL subscribers.
• AT&T spokesman Michael Coe says that given the trends the company is seeing, a form of usage-based pricing for those customers who have abnormally high usage patterns is "inevitable.
• Comcast to user: stop using your cable broadband if you want to keep it.
• Looks like the Canadians are going through the same thing. And they've got more regulations in general than Americans here.
• Webware wonders if Comcast will cut users off. (Only if we let them.) Read the comments by one of the readers, surfyogi2. Way to go, dude. Fight back!
• Really sad for Cox users.
• Roadrunner too. Rot spreading on the net indeed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Apple Should Prepare to Leave China (There Is Still Time To Execute Such A Plan)
At first glance, you might think that the title of this article is a clickbait considering that China is the second biggest economy in the w...
-
At first glance, you might think that the title of this article is a clickbait considering that China is the second biggest economy in the w...
-
I've been using the iSpot for about three weeks now with the iPod Touch. My goal is to determine whether the combination of these two d...
-
MSNBC has brought up the effectiveness of laptop programs for schools. In Maine, the question is whether a laptop for every student make l...