Source: NPR.
Here's a neat breakdown of just how much cable companies have to pay per subscribers to carry certain channels from media companies like Disney and NFL. What's interesting is how much companies have to pay for Fox News. You'd think it's more of an entertainment ("feel good (let's get angry together)" channel) than a news channel.
Also, more on why ESPN is able to command such a bigger subscription rate (NYT).
You would think that maybe some other new players (oh, you know), certain high tech companies with huge ad or hardware profit margins, could step in, pay more or even upfront, to secure new deals to provide users with a new business model to compete against the bundling that cable guys have been forcing down our throats for decades.
Considering how little the NFL channel costs, getting a deal together for the top ten or twenty cable channels is nothing for Apple, Google, or Microsoft.
News, Opinions and Analysis, and Tips on Mobile Life - XO, iPhone, and other Mobile Devices
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Apple Should Prepare to Leave China (There Is Still Time To Execute Such A Plan)
At first glance, you might think that the title of this article is a clickbait considering that China is the second biggest economy in the w...
-
Source: Inside Facebook . Looks like Timeline on Facebook will get more crowded and cumbersome. Not to mention annoying as FB looks to ...
-
Source: Politico , Macrumors . For those waiting for the Mac Pro, looks like it could be one of the first Mac to be made solely in the...
-
The biggest news on the mobile front is what is going to happen a year from now. Today, Intel announced Larrabee, their new GPU architectur...
No comments:
Post a Comment